Ginny Lam, a resident of Richmond, Vancouver, sued her late mother’s estate in 2024. She challenged her mother’s will, claiming it discriminated against her in favor of her brother due to traditional gender bias.
The case went to the British Columbia Supreme Court, where the ruling highlighted the issue of cultural customs influencing modern estate distributions.
Legal Battle Over the Estate
Ginny, upset by her mother’s will, filed a lawsuit because her brother received a larger share of the inheritance. The will, she argued, reflected traditional Chinese customs that favored sons over daughters.
Ginny contended that her mother’s choices were influenced by these outdated cultural beliefs, which unfairly reduced her share of the estate.
Gender Bias and Cultural Influence
The dispute underscored how deeply cultural traditions can impact family decisions, especially concerning inheritance. In this case, Ginny’s mother had followed a long-standing custom that favored male heirs, leaving Ginny with a smaller portion.
According to the UN, traditional gender bias has historically influenced inheritance practices, particularly in Asian cultures. In many societies, sons have been favored as primary heirs due to their roles as ‘family protectors and providers.’
This has led to a cultural expectation that daughters, who often marry and join their husbands’ families, receive less or no inheritance.
The court found that the will indeed favored Ginny’s brother due to gender bias and agreed with her claim that this discrimination should not dictate the division of the estate.
Court Ruling in Favor of Ginny Lam
In 2024, the BC Supreme Court ruled in Ginny’s favor. Initially, she was given 50% of a shared rental property, while her brother received more. However, the court recognized the cultural bias and decided to increase her share to 85%.
This ruling significantly altered the estate distribution, marking an important step in addressing gender inequality in inheritance matters.
Changing Perspectives on Cultural Bias
This case brought to light the clash between traditional customs and modern legal principles. While traditional practices like favoring male heirs were common in the past, the BC Supreme Court emphasized that such biases have no place in today’s legal system. This ruling not only benefited Ginny but also set a precedent for future cases involving cultural discrimination in wills.
Ginny’s victory in court serves as a reminder that gender bias, even when rooted in cultural traditions, can be legally challenged. By addressing this issue, the court reinforced the importance of fair and equal treatment in estate planning, ensuring that all family members receive their rightful share regardless of gender.
Watch the video here:
More from Wake Up Singapore:-
13-Year-Old Rescue Dog Leads Deputy to Save Her 84-Year-Old Owner
Man, 60, Escapes DUI Charges by Drinking Soju During Police Stop
If you have a story or a tip-off, email admin@wakeup.sg or get in touch via Whatsapp at 8882 5913.
Since you have made it to the end of the article, follow Wake Up Singapore on Telegram!
Wake Up Singapore is a volunteer-run site that covers alternative views in Singapore. If you want to volunteer with us, sign up here!
If you can, please do consider buying a mug or two to support Wake Up Singapore’s work!